h1

MaryJanesFarms Magazine – Too White For Me

May 21, 2010

I was reading through the latest issue of MaryJanesFarms magazine.  It was a short article by a woman whose parents had been sharecroppers in Georgia.  There was no picture with the article and I fleetingly wondered about the author’s race.  Race? I wonder… Surely there are pictures of other than white women in this magazine.  Yes, on page 32, in a one paragraph piece about how MaryJanesFarm raised “nearly $900 for earthquake relief in Haiti by donating a percentage of website sales and magazine subscriptions” (seems kind of puny to me) there is a small picture of a Haitian woman.  I checked the other issue I had kicking around still.  Not a single picture of a woman of color.

It seems to me that women of color have a lot to contribute to a magazine about strong women/farm girls (that farm girls thing still grates me).  And perhaps these women are contributing, but the photographs and illustrations certainly suggest that this is a magazine for and about white women.

I am simultaneously flabbergasted and disgusted.  But, I will give them a chance to explain.  I’ve e-mailed the magazine pointing out my observation and asking

Could you tell me a bit about the way photographs are chosen for the magazine as I decide whether MaryJanesFarm’s underlying values are ones I can support?

I’ll wait a day or two and see what they have to say.

tick tick tick tick

OK – I sent my e-mail on Monday it is now Friday and not a word.  And so my recommendation is do not buy MaryJanesFarm’s magazine.  There are some aspects of the magazine that I admire – the recycled paper for one – but this total disregard for a significant percentage of the US population (there isn’t much, besides the aforementioned “support” to Haiti that suggests awareness of a world beyond the US) is … so many adjectives come to mind… objectionable (too weak), offensive (not broad enough), stupid (true), contemptible (not quite right), unsupportable (definitely), misguided (too polite), wrong-headed (certainly), an attempt to spread a whites-only message without saying it out loud while hiding behind a fake message of sustainability, fake because real sustainability includes social, economic, and environmental sustainability and a whites-only ideology is anything but socially sustainable (whoops, a bit longer than an adjective).

Yes, there are occasional cute and interesting tidbits in the magazine – but nothing cuter or more interesting than you can find on the web for free.  Spend your time and money elsewhere.

Advertisements

One comment

  1. Wow, so you never heard anything?! I don’t think I’ll be getting that magazine,either. I had the same issue with that picture frame company, Exposures. I used to get their catalog and noticed the blond blue-eyed kids on every page. I wrote to them, too. Just curious, I went to their website tonight to check and nothing has changed!! Get a clue, people!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: